Skip to Content
Math4201Topology I (Lecture 39)

Math4201 Topology I (Lecture 39)

Separation Axioms

Embedding manifolds

A dd dimensional manifold is the topological space satisfying the following three properties:

  1. Haudorff property (x,yX,U,VTX\forall x,y\in X, \exists U,V\in \mathcal{T}_X such that xUVx\in U\cap V and yUVy\notin U\cap V)
  2. Second countable property (BTX\exists \mathcal{B}\subseteq \mathcal{T}_X such that B\mathcal{B} is a basis for XX and B\mathcal{B} is countable)
  3. Local homeomorphism to Rd\mathbb{R}^d (xM\forall x\in M, there is a neighborhood UU of xx such that UU is homeomorphic to Rd\mathbb{R}^d. φ:URd\varphi:U\to \mathbb{R}^d is bijective, continuous, and open)

Example of manifold

Rd\mathbb{R}^d is a dd-dimensional manifold. And any open subspace of Rd\mathbb{R}^d is also a manifold.


S1S^1 is a 11-dimensional manifold.


T=R2/Z2T=\mathbb{R}^2/\mathbb{Z}^2 is a 22-dimensional manifold.

Recall the Urysohn metirzation theorem. Any normal and second countable space is metrizable.

In the proof we saw that any such space can be embedded into Rω\mathbb{R}^\omega with the product topology.

Question: What topological space can be embedded into Rn\mathbb{R}^n with the product topology?

Theorem for embedding compact manifolds into Rn\mathbb{R}^n

Any dd-dimensional (compact, this assumption makes the proof easier) manifold can be embedded into Rn\mathbb{R}^n with the product topology.

Definition for support of function

supp(f)=f1(R{0})\operatorname{supp}(f)=f^{-1}(\mathbb{R}-\{0\})

Definition for partition of unity

Let {Ui}i=1n\{U_i\}_{i=1}^n be an open covering of XX. A partition of unity for XX dominated by {Ui}i=1n\{U_i\}_{i=1}^n is a set of functions ϕi:XR\phi_i:X\to\mathbb{R} such that:

  1. supp(ϕi)Ui\operatorname{supp}(\phi_i)\subseteq U_i
  2. i=1nϕi(x)=1\sum_{i=1}^n \phi_i(x)=1 for all xXx\in X

Theorem for existence of partition of unity

Let XX be a normal space and {Ui}i=1n\{U_i\}_{i=1}^n is an open covering of XX. Then there is a partition of unity dominated by {Ui}i=1n\{U_i\}_{i=1}^n.

Proof uses Urysohn’s lemma.

Proof for embedding compact manifolds

Let MM be a compact manifold.

For any point xMx\in M, there is an open neighborhood UxU_x of xx such that UxU_x is homeomorphic to Rd\mathbb{R}^d.

Let {Ux}xM\{U_x\}_{x\in M} be an open cover of MM.

Since MM is compact, {Ux}xM\{U_x\}_{x\in M} has a finite subcover.

then {Uxi}i=1n\{U_{x_i}\}_{i=1}^n is an open cover of MM.

Therefore Fi:UxiRdF_i:U_{x_i}\to \mathbb{R}^d is a homeomorphism.

Since MM is compact and second countable, MM is normal.

Then there sis a partition of unity {ϕi:XR}i=1n\{\phi_i:X\to \mathbb{R}\}_{i=1}^n for MM with support by {Uxi}i=1n\{U_{x_i}\}_{i=1}^n dominated by {Uxi}i=1n\{U_{x_i}\}_{i=1}^n. Where

  • i=1nϕi(x)=1\sum_{i=1}^n \phi_i(x)=1
  • supp(ϕi)Uxi\operatorname{supp}(\phi_i)\subseteq U_{x_i}

Define Ψ:XRd\Psi:X\to \mathbb{R}^d as

Ψi(x)={ϕi(x)Fi(x)if xUxi0xXsupp(ϕi)\Psi_i(x)=\begin{cases} \phi_i(x)F_i(x) & \text{if } x\in U_{x_i} \\ 0 & x\in X-\operatorname{supp}(\phi_i) \end{cases}

Note that supp(ϕi)Uxi\operatorname{supp}(\phi_i)\subseteq U_{x_i}, this implies that (Xsupp(ϕi))Uxi=X(X-\operatorname{supp}(\phi_i))\cup U_{x_i}=X.

Uxi(Xsupp(ϕi))=Uisupp(ϕi)U_{x_i}\cap (X-\operatorname{supp}(\phi_i))= U_i-\operatorname{supp}(\phi_i)

In particualr, for any xx in the intersection, ϕi(x)=0    ϕi(x)Fi(x)=0\phi_i(x)=0\implies \phi_i(x)F_i(x)=0.

So on the overlap, ϕi(x)Fi(x)=0\phi_i(x)F_i(x)=0 and hence Ψi\Psi_i is well defined.

Define Φ:XR××R×Rd××RdR(1+d)n\Phi:X\to \mathbb{R}\times \dots \times \mathbb{R}\times \mathbb{R}^d\times \dots \times \mathbb{R}^d\cong \mathbb{R}^{(1+d)n} as

Φ(x)=(ϕ1(x),,ϕn(x),Ψ1(x),,Ψn(x))\Phi(x)=(\phi_1(x),\dots,\phi_n(x),\Psi_1(x),\dots,\Psi_n(x))

This is continuous because ϕi(x)\phi_i(x) and Ψi(x)\Psi_i(x) are continuous.

Since MM is compact, we just need to show that Φ\Phi is one-to-one to verify that it is an embedding.

Let Φ(x)=Φ(x)\Phi(x)=\Phi(x'), then i,ϕi(x)=ϕi(x)\forall i,\phi_i(x)=\phi_i(x'), and i,Ψi(x)=Ψi(x)\forall i,\Psi_i(x)=\Psi_i(x').

Since i=1nϕi(x)=1\sum_{i=1}^n \phi_i(x)=1, i\exists i such that ϕi(x)0\phi_i(x)\neq 0, therefore xUxix\in U_{x_i}.

Since ϕi(x)=ϕi(x)\phi_i(x)=\phi_i(x'), then xUxix'\in U_{x_i}.

This implies that Ψi(x)=Ψi(x)\Psi_i(x)=\Psi_i(x'), ϕi(x)Fi(x)=ϕi(x)Fi(x)\phi_i(x)F_i(x)=\phi_i(x')F_i(x').

So Fi(x)=Fi(x)F_i(x)=F_i(x') since FiF_i is a homeomorphism.

This implies that x=xx=x'.

So Φ\Phi is one-to-one, it is injective.

Therefore Φ\Phi is an embedding.

Last updated on